Authors: Sabrine Jlassi, Hanen Boukhris, Ameni Thabet, Hela Boutighane, Boutheina Mahjoubi, Sihem Hajjeji, Nouha Mghirbi, Souha Ben Youssef.
Abstract:
Introduction:
The shift towards minimally invasive dentistry has made partial posterior restorations a cornerstone of contemporary practice. However, the success of these adhesive restorations is highly dependent on the appropriate selection of restorative materials. With a wide array of options available clinicians face a complex decision that must balance aesthetic demands, functional requirements, and biomechanical properties.
Observation:
This paper aims to provide a clear, clinically-focused framework for selecting the optimal material for partial posterior restorations. It will synthesize evidence-based principles to guide the choice between direct composite, CAD/CAM composite, feldspathic porcelain, lithium disilicate, and resin-matrix ceramics based on specific clinical scenarios.
Discussion:
The discussion will provide a comparative analysis of materials through the lens of key clinical selection criteria: Cuspal coverage, the condition of the surrounding tooth structure, esthetic requirements, pulpal health, restoration thickness, potential for repair or re-intervention
Keywords: Partial bonded restorations, minimally invasive dentistry, Adhesive techniques, Material selection, ceramic classification, clinical cases